World Energy Source®
                                                    
Top > World Energy Monthly Review > June 2008 > Editor's Note
World Energy Monthly Review
December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008
April 2008March 2008January/February 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007
July 2007June 2007May 2007April 2007March 2007January/February 2007December 2006November 2006
October 2006September 2006August 2006July 2006June 2006May 2006April 2006March 2006
February 2006January 2006December 2005November 2005October 2005September 2005August 2005July 2005
June 2005May 2005April 2005
<< Previous   Article 2 of 8   Next >>
Richard R. Loomis

Editor's Note


PRICE of PDF: 0.00

Editor's Note

Seen through the fond haze of nostalgia, news seemed so simple in the past. There were a few trusted newspapers in the morning, Walter Cronkite in the evening. Today, news – or, more to the point, information – pervades us at every turn. The cost of that access appears to be the objectivity of the press.

Now, we Americans have always prided ourselves on our country’s “free press” and “freedom of speech.” But with the advent of the Internet we are forced to confront an ever-increasing, ever-more-vocal community of news reporters who also take it upon themselves to become the newsmakers. Freedom of the press is being hijacked by those entrusted to use it wisely in order to push social agendas. Nowhere is this more apparent than with the subject of global warming.

Our cover story this month looks at how the media is shaping opinion on the issue of climate change. Turn to any network or cable channel, pick up a typical mainstream magazine, and the message is consistent: If we don’t stop driving our cars and plugging in our appliances we will end up killing the planet – or at least making it largely uninhabitable for humans. But what about the other side of the story? “We Report, We Decide” is required reading for anyone who has ever heard a report on global warming and got the sinking feeling that he or she is seeing theory being presented as immutable fact.

Also in this issue, Cyril Widdershoven brings us up to speed on OPEC’s request for security of demand. If the cartel is to invest more in exploration, it wants to know that its customers are willing to put up the cash. And Erika-Marie S. Geiss reminds us that the smallest of changes in habit can start even the most distractible of us on the road to a smaller carbon footprint.

June’s spotlights on North America, Latin America and Africa highlight the controversial “gas-tax holiday,” the paradox of a vastly oil-rich nation whose citizens remain mired in poverty and one African country’s move to oust Chinese interests in favor of Western investment.

We are surrounded by opinion dressed up as fact. Today it’s global warming, tomorrow it could be another issue du jour. Are we stuck with this brand of media-invented reality? Yes. As Walter Cronkite would say, that’s the way it is.

Richard R. Loomis
Editor-in-Chief

Quantity:


Email To Friend